Oracle Read by Other Session Wait Event#LR14186
When a session waits on the "read by other session" event, it indicates a wait for another session to read the data from disk into the Oracle buffer cache. If this happens too often the performance of the query or the entire database can suffer. Typically this is caused by contention for "hot" blocks or objects so it is imperative to find out which data is being contended for. Once that is known, there are several alternative methods for solving the issue.
When information is requested from the database, Oracle will first read the data from disk into the database buffer cache. If two or more sessions request the same information, the first session will read the data into the buffer cache while other sessions wait. In previous versions this wait was classified under the "buffer busy waits" event. However, in Oracle 10.1 and higher this wait time is now broken out into the "read by other session" wait event. Excessive waits for this event are typically due to several processes repeatedly reading the same blocks, e.g. many sessions scanning the same index or performing full table scans on the same table. Tuning this issue is a matter of finding and eliminating this contention.
Finding the contentions
When a session is waiting on the "read by other session" event, an entry will be seen in the v$session_wait system view, which will give more information on the blocks being waited for:
SELECT p1 "file#", p2 "block#", p3 "class#"
WHERE event = 'read by other session';
If information collected from the above query repeatedly shows that the same block (or range of blocks) is experiencing waits, this indicates a "hot" block or object. The following query will give the name and type of the object:
SELECT relative_fno, owner, segment_name, segment_type
WHERE file_id = &file
AND &block BETWEEN block_id AND block_id + blocks - 1;
Depending on the Oracle database environment and specific performance situation the following variety of methods can be used to eliminate contention:
Tune inefficient queries - This is one of those events you need to "catch in the act" through the v$session_wait view as prescribed above. Then, since this is a disk operating system issue, take the associated system process identifier (c.spid) and see what information you can obtain from the operating system.
Redistribute data from the hot blocks - Deleting and reinserting the hot rows will often move them to a new data block. This will help decrease contention for the hot block and increase performance. More information about the data residing within the hot blocks can be retrieved with queries similar to the following:
WHERE owner='&owner' AND object_name='&object';
SELECT dbms_rowid.rowid_create(1,<data_object_id>,<relative_fno>,<block>,0) start_rowid
--rowid for the first row in the block
SELECT dbms_rowid.rowid_create(1,<data_object_id>,<relative_fno>,<block>,500) end_rowid
--rowid for the 500th row in the block
WHERE rowid BETWEEN <start_rowid> AND <end_rowid>
Adjust PCTFREE and PCTUSED - Adjusting the PCTFREE value downward for an object will reduce the number of rows physically stored in a block. Adjusting the PCTUSED value for an object keeps that object from getting prematurely put back on the freelist.
Depending on the type of contention, adjusting these values could help distribute data among more blocks and reduce the hot block problem. Be careful to optimize these parameters so blocks do move in and out of the freelist too frequently.
Reduce the Block Size - This is very similar to adjusting the PCTFREE and PCTUSED parameters in that the goal is to reduce the amount of data stored within one block. In Oracle 9i and higher this can be achieved by storing the hot object in a tablespace with a smaller block size. In databases prior to Oracle 9i the entire database must be rebuilt with a smaller block size.
Optimize indexes - A low cardinality index has a relatively small number of unique values, e.g. a column containing state data with only 50 values. Similar to inefficient queries, the use of a low cardinality index could cause excessive number of blocks to be read into the buffer cache and cause premature aging out of "good" blocks.